The Cruelty Of “Pro-Choice”

These little girls are just as human and just as worthy of life as any of us, yet Karen Hine, an abortion advocate from Canada, believes they should have been killed…

Should have aborted. I’m so over the parents of congenitally handicapped kids claiming they wouldn’t want their kids to be healthy, and saying all the extra health appointments and therapies don’t matter. That’s easy to say when the public health system or insurance covers it for you. Most of these “Down’s syndrome is great!” stories come from parents with young kids. It’s less cute and harder to deal with when they’re in their thirties and forties.

Her comments regarding killing girls through sex selection abortion…

Of course sex-selective abortions should be allowed. If a woman does not want to have a foetus who is one sex or the other, forcing her to go through with the pregnancy is not going to be good for the eventual child, and it’s not going to be good for the mother’s health. Unwanted kids turn out worse, and humans must stop overpopulation because there aren’t enough resources to go around. And abortions are safer than childbirth.

She compares a 32 week old prenatal child to a pig…

Destroying research embryos within 14 days limits chance of medical breakthroughs. Even a 32 week old fetus is not a meaningful person. Their brains are still developing basic functions. People born that early turn out badly. 32 week old fetuses deserve less kindness and consideration than an adult pig or two year old human. Morons.

Here she suggests not caring for premature babies…

Premature babies in neonatal intensive care cost £317,166 ($555,000) per night in the UK, and many preterm babies are admitted for weeks and even months. In the United States preterm birth is thought to cost more than US$26 billion every year. Many die or have long term health problems. Preterm birth is the largest single cause of death in children under the age of five. All that money could otherwise go to saving the lives of people with fully developed brains, hearts and lungs.

How she feels about an 11 year old who didn’t want to kill her baby…

Girl aged 11 becomes Britain’s youngest mother-to-be. She should have been forced to have an abortion. She is too young to consent to the risks of pregnancy and childbirth. Every baby deserves to be born of an adult mother and a planned pregnancy. Babies who don’t get that turn out worse.

Regarding a beautiful little handicapped girl…

The baby that should have been aborted. Doctors told her parents an abortion would be the most humane choice, but they didn’t want to. She has osteogenesis imperfecta, an incurable condition that causes chronic pain and limited mobility. Her care requires a lot of extra resources. Why choose to burden society with a severely disabled child who suffers chronically, when you could try again for a healthy one?

Her thoughts on parents who provide healthcare for their disabled children…

Parents refuse abortion, then euthanasia for their severely disabled child. Thankfully judges have overruled their wishes because the child has a poor quality of life and would not live long anyway. Parents must not be allowed to impose futile care on their dying kids. Wasting resources on doomed kids takes money from needy people who actually stand a chance. These parents were greedy and selfish not to abort the pregnancy when the defects were detected and the doctors recommended termination.

Here she encourages parents to speak out about regretting having children…

“All the mothers I talked to had planned their pregnancies, and yet every one of them was full of regret – a feeling they had never anticipated.” The damage children do to your body and career can never be fully repaired. Kids break apart many marriages and generally worsen marital satisfaction more than enhance it.

She believes children should be killed rather than raised by others…

Many kids in orphanages in poor countries have living parents who are unable or unwilling to care for them because they are poor and have too many mouths to feed. Providing parents with financial support to raise them at home would have been the moral and financially prudent thing to do, rather than funding an orphanage. Better access to contraception and abortion can also reduce poverty and mean fewer kids living in orphanages.

I could go on and on with comments uttered by this depraved woman. Don’t fool yourself into believing that she stands alone. Almost all abortion advocates believe exactly what she believes, they just keep their thoughts to themselves. If you don’t believe me, visit a few ‘pro-choice’ websites and social media accounts. You will rarely find them advocating for adoption. They always focus on one choice — the choice to kill.

We must expose this dangerous ideology. History is repeating itself. Everything this woman believes is what the Nazi German State and Margaret Sanger, the founder of Planned Parenthood, believed.

“The idea that some lives matter less is the root of all that is wrong with the world.”

Respond to The Cruelty Of “Pro-Choice”

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s