In Defense of the Defenseless

The Supreme Court of the United States of America voted to continue to allow the horrific conditions and lack of oversight that led to the Kermit Gosnell house of horrors. Today’s Whole Woman’s Health vs Hellerstedt decision will forever remove the idea that those in favor of killing preborn children want the facilities where they are slaughtered and the abortionists who run them to be ‘safe’. Today’s decision is yet another glaring hypocrisy and further erodes the idea that all lives matter.

Voting in favor of running substandard human slaughterhouses…

  • Justice Anthony M. Kennedy
  • Justice Sonia Sotomayor
  • Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg
  • Justice Elena Kagan
  • Justice Stephen G. Breyer

Voting in favor of running medically regulated human slaughterhouses…

  • Chief Justice John G. Roberts
  • Justice Clarence Thomas
  • Justice Samuel A. Alito, Jr.

Abortion champions had long claimed they wanted the killing of our preborn children to be ‘safe, legal, and rare’. Then they dropped the idea that it should be rare, and began to claim it should just be ‘safe and legal’. Now, they can only claim they want the killing to be ‘legal’.

This is what America has become.

Posted by cultureshift

A plea to win the hearts of those who choose to dehumanize our development and undermine our right to live.

One Comment

  1. Kermit Gosnell is the exception to the rule, not the standard. His methods and clinic were deplorable and reprehensible, and they most certainly do not represent the overwhelming majority of responsible clinics and doctors.

    HB2’s rules did not properly reflect the risks associated with abortion, a procedure that is extremely safe, safer in fact than colonoscopies and childbirth itself. If abortion was a risky procedure, then the rules set out in HB2 would have been warranted and women would have been happy to be assured that all abortion clinics would be properly outfitted, but thats not the case.


Leave a Reply