… Okay at first I was ignoring your bull but that’s disgusting.
A useless clump? Seriously? To assume that an unborn child isn’t alive is nonsense. If it weren’t alive it’d decay. Just because it isn’t developed doesn’t mean it isn’t alive. When you’re 12 you have no ‘career’. When you’re 1 you have barely ANY of the things listed. We’re just rewinding the human life until the point where it’s lacking many things an adult human has, but it is still alive. You don’t “suddenly” get a life stuffed into you when you’re born.
and to assume a baby doesn’t have feelings is stupid too! They have been proven to respond to certain sounds and even panic when something doesn’t seem right. Just because it’s underdeveloped emotion doesn’t mean it’s completely non-existent.
Allow me to show you what a close friend showed me.
A statement by Dr. Paul E. Rockwell, M.D.
“Eleven years ago while giving an anesthetic for a ruptured ectopic pregnancy (at 8 weeks gestation), I was handed what I believe was the smallest living human ever seen. The embryonic sac was intact and transparent. Within the sac was a tiny human male swimming extremely vigorously in the amniotic fluid, while attached to the wall by the umbilical cord. This tiny human was perfectly developed, with long, tapering fingers, feet and toes. It was almost transparent, as regards the skin, and the delicate arteries and veins were prominent to the ends of the fingers.The baby was extremely alive and swam about the sac approximately one time per second, with a natural swimmer’s stroke. This tiny human did not look at all like the photos and drawings and models of ‘embryos’ which I had seen, nor did it look like a few embryos I have been able to observe since then, obviously because this one was alive! When the sac was opened, the tiny human immediately lost his life and took on the appearance of what is accepted as the appearance of an embryo at this stage of life (with blunt extremities etc.).”
But either way, a single cell would be considered ‘life’. So to assume a developing child with it’s own heartbeat and DNA, that is slowly moving towards it’s own future with ‘a career, friends, memories, goals etc) and feelings’ is something that it’s morally right to just “destroy” is disgusting.
P.S… I give NO living human being more rights than another living human being. I don’t believe one should murder another, ever. This being why I support pregnant people defending themselves when pregnancy is a LITERAL threat to their survival. Because one should never kill the other. A human being is responsible for THEIR own existence. It has a right to its own existence, not anyone else.
Hello again. Just wanted to point out that fetuses aren\'t sentient life forms with lives (by lives I mean a career, friends, memories, goals etc) and feelings. So you are basically giving a useless clump more rights than a person with a uterus
