one of my friends has a gorgeous little boy with cleft lip and palate. she found this out after having a 4d scan while she was pregnant. upon learning that he had this, the nurse told he she should have a abortion to prevent unnecessary costs to the nhs, and to her family. i’m pro choice, because everyone should have a choice, but how the hospital treated her is vile, and attempting to force abortion on those with “different” children, is vile. i’ll stand for that.

If you believe that a mother should have the choice to kill her preborn son or daughter and you base this belief on the concept of bodily autonomy, then you must also endorse this choice when…

…she chooses to kill her little boy because he has Down syndrome,

…she chooses to kill her little girl because she wanted a little boy,

…she chooses to kill her interracial child because she wanted them pure,

…she chooses to kill her daughter because she has autism,

…she chooses to kill her son because he has a cleft palate,

…she chooses to kill one of her twins because she only wanted one child,

…and even if she chooses to kill her baby after eight months of gestation.

This is what it truly means to be an advocate for killing children while they are awaiting their birth. This is what it truly means to champion the strong over the weak, the oppressor over the oppressed, and the depraved over the defenseless. And like every form of legalized killing based on the dehumanization of those doing the dying, it will expand because people will find ‘good’ reasons to kill the less privileged. Just like the hospital tried to rationalize the killing by citing the money the state will save. We’ve heard this before…

This Nazi poster (from around 1938) reads: “60,000 Reichsmark is what this person suffering from a hereditary defect costs the People’s community during his lifetime. Fellow citizen, that is your money too.

Stand for Life, no matter what.