Since my reply to this person for some reason is not showing up in my account activity for a post I made, it just shows up for the person I replied to, I’m going to post this so people can see my reply to a pro-abortionist as I shoot down each of their positions one by one.  Enjoy :)



“It does not matter if it is a separate entity, that was not what I was saying. I said that it is inside the pregnant person, therefore giving her the final say on determining what happens to their body and whatever’s in it.”

Every woman has the right to decide what they do with their body.   They however should not be allowed to terminate their unborn child because that child is not THEIR body.  It belongs to the child.


“No. A fetus does not have any rights. It is a potential person, meaning that if it is born, it becomes a person. Then it receives its rights. We don’t grant rights based on potential. Next time, don’t send me such a biased link.”

Not according to 76% of the states in the United Sates who have Fetal Homicide Laws, with 23 that apply to the earliest stage of pregnancies.


And not according to the Alabama Supreme Court ruled that ruled in a case this year “unborn children are persons with rights that should be protected by law.”


And not according to the other laws on the books here in the US and around the world.


Rights are not given or granted, because all of us, gay or straight, male or female, white or black,  born or unborn, are entitled to rights, including the right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.   


And on the links, the proof, I send you if you would actually drop your bias and ignorance you would learn the truth.  It’s obvious from your rhetoric though you are ignorant so remain ignorant if you want by I won’t let you deceive people with your ignorance. 

“Not every state has fetal protection laws, and if they do, they are unconstitutional and will be overturned. Fetal protection/personhood laws place the non-existent rights of a fetus over the rights of a full blown, born human being.”

38 of them do.   


Fetal protections laws are unconstitutional?  Not according to the Declaration of Independence, “We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.”  These laws protect the life and liberty of the unborn, who have rights like everybody else, so in no way are they unconstitutional.  Overturned?  Don’t get ahead of yourself.


And the unborn have non-existent rights based on what stage of life they are in?  Your rhetoric is the same as those of the infamous Rober B. Taney, relating to the Dred Scott case, who claimed an African American had no rights based on the color of his/her skin, who said, “they [African Americans, and in your case the unborn] have no rights which the white man is bound to respect.” 


It is also similar to the rhetoric from other judges who said “that a black (in your case the unborn)…was not entitled to the rights of a federal citizen and therefore had no standing in court.”


You don’t see the similarities?  You should.  You should see that your views violate the very nature of human dignity and human rights, that everyone, no matter what stage of life they are in, have the right to live. 


“I’m familiar with that case that you linked, and it is bullshit. She disclosed to them information that happened a year prior, and although a drug test came back negative, they saw that she was unfit, and afforded her fetus a lawyer. That’s absolutely ridiculous, and shows what happens when people like you care only about the fetus.”

It’s BS?  Okay, turn to ignorant statements like that to try and win a debate, because it only shows how ignorant you are.  You obviously aren’t as familiar with the case as you think.  Read this from the link I sent you, “Beltran admitted a past struggle with the painkiller Percocet. But that was all behind her, Beltran said: She had been taking Suboxone, a drug used to treat Percocet dependency. Lacking health insurance and unable to afford the medication, Beltran had used an acquaintance’s prescription and self-administered the drug in decreasing doses. She had taken her last dose a few days before her prenatal visit.”


This woman willingly put her unborn child in danger by taking Suboxone without the permission of a certified physician or a doctor using a prescription that was meant for another individual.  It’s ridiculous to protect the rights of the unborn?  What’s ridiculous is you stating that depending on the life stage a human being has no rights, which is your argument by saying the unborn have no rights.  This woman willingly put her unborn child at risk and deserves to face criminal charges for putting the unborn baby in danger:

… when a woman decides to carry her pregnancy to term, we can expect that a child will be born, and this future child has a right to be protected from avoidable harm. Certain behaviors during pregnancy are known to cause harm to offspring. Poor nutrition can retard fetal growth and impair brain development. Use of heroin can result in fetal addiction. Heavy alcohol use can cause mental retardation and physical malformations. Altering one’s diet or refraining from alcohol or drugs presents no serious risk to a pregnant woman’s life or health. When a pregnant woman who has decided to give birth to a child engages in activities that she could reasonably avoid and that will damage that child, society has a duty to protect the future child, even if this means forcing the pregnant woman to change her behavior.


And people like me?  Stop trying to turn this into a pissing match and get some facts rather than giving me your ignorant comments based on nothingness.

“Consent to sex is not consent to pregnancy. Sex is not just for pro-creation. Birth control fails. And it doesn’t matter if I have all the unprotected sex in the world, I am still not obligated to carry through with a pregnancy.”

If you get in a car intoxicated and crash your car, you have to live with that.  If you overdose on drugs and get in a coma, you have to live with that.  If you have sex and that results in a pregnancy, you have to live with that.  Birth control fails?  Tough, a person has to live with their decision and the consequences of that decision.   A child’s life is not determined by how you feel about that.

“This statement of yours ignores those who become pregnant from rape, and those that were not given adequate sex education or don’t have access to birth control.”

My statement does not ignore women, your statements ignore women.  You ignore all the unborn women who have been terminated as a result of abortion.  Also, I want the rapist to be punished, I want them to pay for the terrible crime against humanity they have committed, I don’t want the child to die for the father’s crime. 


On birth control, campuses nurses give out birth control, Planned Parenthood give out birth control, county health clinics give out birth control.  They all give out birth control for FREE.  And you say women don’t have access to birth control?


And if people don’t want FREE birth control, individuals can purchase birth control for costs around 15$ to 50$ dollars a month.  So women do have access to birth control.


“This not a ‘so-called’ right. It is a right. Guaranteed to me. Even of we agreed that a fetus was granted all the same rights as anyone else, that would STILL not allow them to inhabit my body without my consent. No born person can do that, so why should a fetus be able to?”

Yes, you have a right to have consensual sex, and you have the right to take precautions as not to get pregnant.  However, you do not have the right to terminate an unborn child because you don’t want it.  You made the decision to bring that child into being without their consent, so you have to live with that.  No born person can do that because it’s biologically impossible.  Again, where are the facts?  Enough with the ignorance and foolish statements please.


“Think abortion is wrong. Whatever. But don’t you dare think that you, a man, can tell me what I will or will not do with my body. You will never have any idea what it is like to be pregnant, and you can leave the decisions about my reproductive organs and my well-being up to me.  Thanks.”

Oh so because I’m a man who’s against abortion I obviously am sexist?  Your ignorance is laughable.  Do whatever you want with your body.  Repeat, YOUR BODY!  No one should have the right however to terminate the unborn.  So do the world a favor and shut up, because all you’ve given are ignorant statements with no factual backing or support whatsoever throughout this response.


I  challenge all of you to read every word and every link of this beautiful response to the typical pro-choice pseudo-science and malformed pro-choice ‘philosophy of life’ we are consistently exposed to. Thanks goes out to rdfalberg for this incredible defense of the defenseless.

Posted by cultureshift

A plea to win the hearts of those who choose to dehumanize our development and undermine our right to live.

Leave a Reply