This comment references this post.
Earlier, you stated “killing another human being is wrong.” But what about the already-born children of a woman who needs an abortion to maintain the standard of life for her other children? Some people don’t have the finances necessary to support another child, which would bring down the quality of life for the other children, and eventually, could possibly end theirs. So you’re saying it’s wrong for a woman to abort, to rid herself of a foetus even if it saves her other kids. Some pro-lifer.
Death is not the only solution to a problem. A pregnant mother has three options:
1. Be a parent to her child.
2. Give the gift of parenthood to another through adoption.
3. Kill her child.
There are many of us who see option three as immoral. We see option three as a non-option. Option three is why I started this blog.
We will never be able to create a society free of human atrocities until we remove option three. Why? Because our moral compass is useless if we allow the killing of our own preborn family members, our own sons and daughters. The most vulnerable among us. The ones without a voice. The ones so easy to kill and dispose of that it’s actually legal and profitable in the United States of America, the land that promises Life, Liberty, and the pursuit of Happiness. A promise that has been broken in this country since 1973.
Pro-life simply wants to restore that promise.