anonymous:
Why would you label a pro-life rants as pro-choice? First of all, WE DON’T WANT TO SEE THAT SHIT. Second, an embryo isn’t a baby. Tell yourself it is all you want, but it isn’t. No more than a fucking acorn is a fully grown tree. Keep your right wing bullshit out of my uterus.
cultureshift:
The purpose of labeling pro-choice is two fold: 1) no point in ‘preaching to the choir’, and 2) pro-choice also applies to the preborn child. You and I both know that you would have made the choice to be born if you would have had a voice prior to your birth. We are the voice for the voiceless. The pro-life movement fought for you when you were in the womb and continues to fight for those whose lives are currently at risk.
Further, not all babies aborted are at the embryonic stage of their development, many are at the fetal stage. I assume you read my post Love Them Both. That dead child was clearly not an embryo. Regardless of what stage of development a child has reached, they are all human beings. Clearly, we would not be having this conversation if either of us had been aborted.
Enjoy the life you were lucky enough to be granted by your mother. Someday, that life will be guaranteed by the law as provided by the Constitution of the United States — ‘nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property’.
